Unit 2 Part E: Final Review

 

The Drama Club is done and the performance has been performed. Now I am gonna review it personally and say if I think anything could have gone better.

What Went Well

I improved upon my leadership skills and have successfully organised a public showing of the performances. I feel quite proud of what we achieved over the course of the last few weeks and I feel like all the students learned something. This experience has helped boost my confidence by no small a degree and it has helped me to develop my skills in acting and in teaching. The greatest achievement we made was definitely our final performance that we gave to everyone. It felt good to see the performances that we had worked hard on over the last few weeks come to life and see people experience them.

Even Better If

I think I could have spent a little bit more time working on the club as the students could probably have done with a few extra weeks working on their performances. As the feedback that I received that I included in an earlier post states their was not enough time for too many rehearsals and whilst we did the best we could there were still little slip ups like a kid not looking at the audience. If I had given us a few more weeks, by pushing back the event, then I think we could have ironed out these mistakes and sorted everything out so that the pieces were more fluid and more enjoyable for the audience.

What I Have Learned

I improved my skills as I have said and I spent a while assisting with the performances so I have learned a few teaching techniques. Working with Rochelle has taught me a good deal about dealing with little people. She and I began with quite different styles of teaching when we began the club but when I notice people reacted better to her more light-hearted attitude to the club I began to imitate that and found the it produced positive results and a better performance from the kids. The feedback I got has shown me what I can do better and if I were to do it again I would take said feedback to heart and extend the process of performance making by a good month giving us enough time to create our own visions of the performance and not have to compromise them for the sake of meeting a rapidly approaching deadline.

 

 

Unit 1 Part C: Live theatre review

The Madness of King George III was written in 1991 by Alan Bennett. I saw this play at the end of November 2018 at the Nottingham playhouse after seeing a trailer for the live screening of the film before a screening of another Alan Bennett play “Allelujah!” at the  Playhouse cinema in Louth. The play starred Adrian Scarborough as Dr. Willis and Mark Gatiss as the titular role of George III.

By far the greatest decision that director Adam Penford has made in his first year leading the Nottingham playhouse was to revive this play. The Madness of king George III tells the tale of the first bout of madness suffered by King George in the 1780s, the attempts to cure him by his doctors and the political turmoil that the prince of wales is reaping in the Kings absence. This play has not become less relevant today even though it was first preformed almost 28 years ago. Nearly the most important man in the western world is basically insane after all. Whilst this theme and that of the parliament being in turmoil are not exploited to their fullest extent means that whilst the play is still important it is not as relevant as it could be.

The second greatest decision of Adam Penford’s ongoing tenure is the casting of Mark Gatiss. As the king Gatiss gives an awesome performance, dominating every scene he’s in. Most of the cast are thoroughly impressive but the only other truly great performance comes from Adrian Scarborough who plays the man tasked with curing the king. Scarborough and Gatiss are in numerous scenes together and they work together incredibly well with the two characters fighting for dominance of the room. Throughout the play Gatiss takes advantage of his height. Standing at 6 foot 1 inch he towers over the rest of the cast and with his erratic movement coupled with his high paced line delivery Gatiss is able to show complete control over the rest of the characters and emphasize the importance of the king in this society. It is even more impressive, then, that Scarborough is able to realistically show control over Gatiss. Scarborough is merely 5 foot 4 inches and so is visibly shorter than Gatiss leading to some electric scenes between the two of them as their struggle for power plays out. The descent into madness is played excellently by Gatiss who conveys the anguish felt by George as he feels his mind slipping away perfectly. The relationship between George and Willis is show to be one of tough love as Willis is ready to do anything for (and to) the king in attempt to cure him. This develops as the play goes on and the two soon become begrudging allies with a mutual respect for one another, again portrayed greatly by the two leads.  The only moments where the performance felt a tiny bit lacking was where the old doctors of the king talked about the impact of Willis arriving on their own lives. It could have been a lo more dramatic and real if the two actresses had spent a little bit more time delivering the scene as it was clear;y somewhat rushed.

The comedy of this play is one of the greatest elements at work. Bennett has been known for his plays being funny but The Madness of King George III stands above the rest with perfect timing and delivery. The funniest joke comes in the form of a catchphrase, of sorts, of King Georges. At the start of the play the king ends a good chunk of his lines with the expression “what, what?” the delivery from Gatiss allows for it to be used in a number of different manners and emphasize the current feeling form the king. A number of characters spend a small amount of time complaining about it but soon into the plays first half the king begins to slip into madness and the “what what-ing” is forgotten about. When George starts to make a recovery, after a superbly funny scene where Willis lets George read through King Lear (he “didn’t know what it was about”), George he begins to speak sense again and concludes a sentence talking about how he should spend more time in treatment with “what, what.” The staggered notice of the cast and the few seconds where they notice make for very funny few moments and a welcome bout of humor that had been missing since the king slipped. Another notable comedic area of the play comes in the form Of the prince of wales. The prince is scheming to replace his father and turn parliament upside down but is always doing so in an amusing manner. The performance of the prince is clearly inspired by Blackadder and although it can get a little old at times it was nice to be able to us his jokes as a reason to hate him even more.

Robert Jones designed the set for this piece and used two large rotating blocks at the back of the stage to show location. The sharp 90° angles of the set allow for us to see the play as set in a sharp and harsh environment and the changing costumes Gatiss wears throughout the play help to show the stages of his sanity. he goes from wearing luxurious lavish outfits to being dressed in rags and the clear absence of his former worn wig marks the true point that he goes crazy, as they believed in the 1780s. Richard Howell allows for natural lighting for most of the play and so when he uses a spotlight at the end of the first half of the play is a real shock to the watching audience and adds on to the shock of what is being depicted on screen. What, I hear you ask, what is being depicted on screen, what what? The scene in the closing moments of the first half sees a cluster of Willis’, recently arrived on stage, surround the king and usher him into a chair. Scarborough is giving his best performance that he can as he shouts to the other doctors of his plans and we realize that he is not who he presented himself to be, a nice and calming doctor, but rather he is a man who is ready to do anything. The music is playing at its loudest and the characters are shouting their lines when the servants pull back as one to show the king restrained to a chair, illuminated by the fore mentioned spotlight. “I am the king of England!” Gatiss cries in despair. “No, Sir!” replies Scarborough, “You are my Patient!” The curtains close and the audience is in shock. The way that George’s madness is portrayed is not better in any scene but this and the cruel and harsh Dr. Willis revel to be who he is is heart stopping. this is the single best scene in the entire play and is therefore, unsurprisingly, the scene they chose for the trailer that I had seen not a week earlier. But up close the scene has so much more impact. the two actors are at the top of their game and with the lighting and music all being perfect for this scene meant that I was literally frozen to my chair for half the interval. I missed the opportunity to get totally over-priced ice cream.

Gatiss’ performance is a tour-de-force in an epic play that i would have been the lesser for not seeing. The casting was perfect as was the sound and whilst for the majority of the first act I was thinking that Richard Howell had phoned it in when it came to lighting i realized that it was a genius move when one scene rolled around. This play is honestly my favorite piece of live theatre I have ever seen performed and is the only play I ever seriously considered seeing again. I left the playhouse still thinking about the scene just before the interval and I can say with 78% certainty that anyone other than Gatiss would not have been able to do half the job that Gatiss did. Basically it was awesome.

Taking inspiration from the staging of this play I have re-shot a couple of scenes for my film to create a more minimalist feel to it. This should improve my editing and directing skills with the play influencing my future projects as I will look back at this and compare the lay out to this play and try to include the same sort of aesthetic feel to it.

 

Unit 1 Part B: Reflections 22/12/18

The final performance of the play took place yesterday and I think it went fairly well. I utilised the Saturday rehearsals well as they let me run through all of my scenes whilst also giving a last few pieces of advice to a couple of friends and it also let me assist in a few other areas of the production of the play. On the second Saturday there was a problem with the lights as one of the lighting directors was taken and ill and no one else was fully able to work the lighting board and position everything correctly. Fortunately in Year 10 I had a really bad drama teacher who had, in one lesson, instructed me to read the manual on and learn to operate all the lights that the drama department owns. I was therefore able to, with the assistance of the lighting directors assistant as it had been two years since I read the manual, get the lights working well enough that we were able to complete a full dress rehearsal without too much going wrong as far as the lights were concerned.

The performances themselves went alright. I was only the Wiz on the 18th and the 20th and unfortunately I was put in the group with an actress who was not particularly interested in knowing her lines. When she missed a cue that would have lead into my monologue that is basically the culmination of the play I was forced to improvise a couple of lines that forced the lion in to saying what was basically Dorothy’s line so that we could continue the play. Apart from this little problem here, and a couple of other lines Dorothy decided not to say, the play went other smoothly and everything worked out Okay. The final performance did have one hiccup but that was my fault and I was able to resolve it. When I am the Wiz’s shadow on the day that I am not the Wiz I wear a hat to make the shadow appear similar to the Wiz when he steps out from behind the curtain. We have two hats between us, a green one for Oz and a brown one for Marvel. The green hat is more comfortable and so I wear it for the first of the two shadow scenes but then I am supposed to walk round the school and give Oz the correct hat. But I forgot. Until right before the second scene where Oz is meant to walk on and I am supposed to be a shadow at the same time. I had to sprint around the school, give him the hat, back again and dive in front of the spotlight to be the shadow in time. So whilst a few things went wrong everything basically worked out OK and the whole experience has helped me improve my acting and directing skills.

Before this process began I looked into a number of Theatrical skills I wanted to improve. My characterisation and my ability to create meaning through body language. I am fairly confident that I was successful as I was complimented on my performance and upon my take on the Wizard by a number of people including in a letter by Mr. Watkins that I have included in a different post in this unit. The experience of being in this play has given me a wider view of the art as I have not previously been in a play in the same ballpark as this before and it has given me a chance to experience different techniques of acting and a more varied approach to line learning. In the future I will compare back to this performance and general experience as I believe it has been fairly unique and so should help me to compare any plays I do in the future to this one.